SYLLABUS

GS-3: Indian Economy and issues relating to planning, mobilization of resources, growth, development and employment.

Context: Recently, NITI Aayog released the second edition of the Fiscal Health Index (FHI) 2026, providing a comprehensive assessment of the fiscal performance of Indian states.

About the Fiscal Health Index (FHI)

  • The Fiscal Health Index (FHI) is a data-driven framework developed by NITI Aayog to assess and compare the fiscal performance of Indian states.
  • It was conceptualised to evaluate fiscal soundness, guide reforms, and promote evidence-based fiscal policymaking in the states.
  • The Index provides systematic benchmarking across states, helping identify fiscal strengths, weaknesses, and areas requiring policy intervention.
  • The need for such an assessment has increased as state governments play a crucial role in India’s fiscal architecture and account for nearly one-third of the country’s general government debt.
  • The composite FHI is developed using data from the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) and focuses on five sub-indices:
    • Quality of Expenditure
    • Revenue Mobilization
    • Fiscal Prudence
    • Debt Index
    • Debt Sustainability
  • The first edition (2025) assessed 18 major states, while the second edition expands coverage to include 10 North-Eastern and Himalayan states, making the Index more inclusive and representative of India’s fiscal diversity.
  • Due to structural differences such as geographical remoteness, limited revenue capacity, sparse population, and higher service delivery costs, North-Eastern and Himalayan states are ranked separately from major states.
  • The Index also provides longitudinal analysis of fiscal trends from FY 2014-15 to FY 2023-24, offering insights for policymakers, researchers, and stakeholders.
  • It aligned with India’s broader vision of achieving “Viksit Bharat @2047.”

Key Findings of the Index

  • Overall Fiscal Trends: Fiscal outcomes vary significantly across states, reflecting differences in fiscal discipline, revenue mobilisation, and expenditure management.
    • Among the 18 major states, several recorded moderate FHI scores in 2023-24, indicating emerging fiscal pressures.
    • States with stronger fiscal discipline and revenue mobilisation generally rank higher, while lower-ranked states exhibit higher non-developmental expenditure and weaker fiscal sustainability.
  • Performance of Major States: Odisha remains the top performer, supported by controlled deficits and stable revenues.
    • Goa and Jharkhand also feature among the Achiever states, while Gujarat and Maharashtra remain within the top five.
    • Haryana recorded a notable improvement in ranking.
    • Bihar, Karnataka, and Telangana show mild recovery, while Chhattisgarh, Tamil Nadu, and Rajasthanexperienced rank declines due to weakening fiscal indicators.
    • Punjab, West Bengal, Kerala, and Andhra Pradesh remain under fiscal stress with rising debt levels, sustained deficits, and modest revenue growth.
  • Achiever States (Odisha, Goa, Jharkhand)
    • High own-tax share (above 60%)
    • Large capital outlay (around 4–5% of GSDP)
    • Fiscal deficit below 3% of GSDP
    • Moderate debt (below 25% of GSDP)
  • Front-Runner States: Gujarat, Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh, Telangana, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka
  • Performer States: Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Bihar, Tamil Nadu, Rajasthan
  • Aspirational States: West Bengal, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Punjab
    • Characterised by high debt (35–45% of GSDP), persistent deficits, high committed expenditure (50–60% of revenue receipts), and large interest burdens.
  • Performance of North-Eastern and Himalayan States: These states are ranked separately and classified into:
    • Achievers: Arunachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand
    • Performers: Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Sikkim, Tripura
    • Aspirational: Himachal Pradesh, Manipur, Nagaland
    • Arunachal Pradesh ranks highest due to strong expenditure quality and prudent debt management.
    • Uttarakhand performs well due to strong own-revenue mobilisation.
    • Tripura shows good debt sustainability, while Meghalaya and Assam display mixed performance across indicators.
    • Himachal Pradesh and Manipur remain constrained by high committed expenditure and weak revenue mobilisation.
    • Several states rely heavily on Union transfers, with some receiving over 80% of their revenue from central transfers.
  • Policy Priorities Identified: The report highlights several reforms to strengthen fiscal health:
    • Enhancing revenue mobilisation, especially by strengthening the state’s own-tax capacity and broadening the GST base.
    • Rationalising committed expenditures such as salaries, pensions, and subsidies to improve fiscal flexibility.
    • Improving the quality and composition of capital expenditure.
    • Adopting medium-term fiscal planning frameworks to manage deficits and debt trajectories.
    • Monitoring off-budget borrowings and strengthening public financial management systems.
  • Improving transparency using CAG-verified fiscal data and benchmarking through tools like the Fiscal Health Index.

About the NITI Aayog (National Institution for Transforming India)

  • On January 1, 2015, the NITI Aayog was established as the successor to the Planning Commission, created by an executive resolution from the Government of India (Union Cabinet).
  • it is a non-constitutional (not created by the Constitution) and non-statutory (not created by an Act of Parliament) body.
  • Role and Function of NITI Aayog:
    • NITI Aayog serves as the premier policy think tank of the Government of India, providing both directional and policy inputs.
    • NITI Aayog is responsible for designing strategic and long-term policies and programs for the Government of India.
    • It also provides technical advice to both the Centre and States.
    • The one-way flow of policy from the Centre to States, characteristic of the Planning Commission era, is being replaced with a genuine partnership between the Centre and States.
    • NITI Aayog encourages a collaborative approach, as opposed to the command-and-control method of the past.
    • In line with the spirit of federalism, NITI Aayog operates on a bottom-up approach, shaping its policy thinking by considering inputs from various stakeholders, rather than the traditional top-down model.
  • The NITI Aayog Composition:
  1. Chairperson: The Prime Minister of India.
  2. Governing Council: Includes Chief Ministers of all States, Chief Ministers of Union Territories with legislatures, and Lt. Governors of other Union Territories.
  3. Regional Councils: Formed to address issues affecting multiple states/regions, convened by the Prime Minister, chaired by the Chairperson or their nominee.
  4. Special Invitees: Experts and specialists nominated by the Prime Minister.
  5. Full-time Organisational Framework:
    • Vice-Chairperson: Appointed by the Prime Minister, with Cabinet Minister rank.
    • Full-time Members: Hold the rank of Minister of State.
    • Part-time members, ex-officio members, chief executive officer and secretariat.

Sources:
Pib
Newsonair
Niti

Shares: