Context:
According to the “Climate in the Crosshairs” report, NATO’s military expenditures in 2023 produced more greenhouse gas emissions than Qatar and Colombia.
More on the news:
- This report released during NATO’s 75th anniversary, in Washington DC.
- The report by organizations like Transnational Institute and Tipping Point North-South highlights the environmental impact of military spending using data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI’s 2024 data).
Key Findings of the Report
- Greenhouse Gas Emissions: NATO’s military spending in 2023 resulted in approximately 233 million metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e), greenhouse gas emissions. This amount surpasses the annual emissions of several countries, including Colombia and Qatar.
- Impact of Spending Increase: An additional $126 billion in military spending in 2023 is projected to add 31 million metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e), equivalent to the annual emissions of around 6.7 million average US cars.
- Contrast with Climate Goals: Despite global climate goals requiring a 43% reduction in emissions by 2030, NATO increased its military emissions by about 15% in 2023, conflicting with these targets.
- Financial and Climate Implications: NATO’s increased military spending could fund minimal climate financing needs multiple times over and potentially meet climate adaptation costs for low- and middle-income countries for seven years, according to United Nations Environment Programme estimates.
About the NATO
- The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is an intergovernmental political and military alliance of 32 member states from Europe and North America.
- It was established in the aftermath of World War II, the organization implemented the North Atlantic Treaty (Washington Treaty), signed in Washington, D.C. in 1949.
- Headquarters: Brussels, Belgium.
- It is a collective defense system where member states agree to defend each other in case of an external attack.
Article 5 of the Washington Treaty states that an attack against one Ally is considered an attack against all, forming the core of the Alliance and ensuring a promise of mutual defense.
Concerns and Call for Action:
- The report raises concern that NATO’s military expenditure benefits arms firms while worsening the climate crisis.
- It advocates for a global reduction in military spending to redirect resources toward climate investments, emphasizing the need for international cooperation to secure a sustainable future.